Zum Inhalt springen
ModelAufgelistetExtern
Herunterladen

Deepfake Detection

A high-accuracy deepfake face detector trained on Celeb-DF v2, combining an EfficientNet-B4 backbone with Grad-CAM spatial attribution and a deterministic forensic report generator. The model classifies face images...

ArtOtherVersionBest modelCBewertung

Modellquelle

Art
Other
Dateigröße
69,4 MB
Version
vBest model
Aktualisiert
2. Nov. 2026
Quelle
Hugging Face

Quellenbeschreibung

EfficientNet-B4 Deepfake Detector with Grad-CAM Explainability

A high-accuracy deepfake face detector trained on Celeb-DF v2, combining an EfficientNet-B4 backbone with Grad-CAM spatial attribution and a deterministic forensic report generator. The model classifies face images as real or fake and highlights which facial region triggered the decision.

Bachelor project — Sapienza Università di Roma, AI & Applied Computer Science


Model Performance

MetricScore
Frame-Level AUC-ROC0.9933
Video-Level AUC-ROC0.9990
Frame Accuracy97.46%
Frame F1 Score98.55%
False Negative Rate0.44% (37 / 8,475 fakes missed)

Video-level scores are computed by mean-aggregating frame probabilities per video ID, which suppresses single-frame noise and reflects real-world deployment.


What Makes This Different

  • Explainable predictions — Grad-CAM heatmaps highlight the exact facial zone (forehead, eyes, nose, jaw, or hairline) that triggered the detection.
  • Forensic text output — A template engine converts confidence + activated zones into a structured human-readable forensic report (4 confidence tiers).
  • Video-level reasoning — Frame scores are aggregated per video for a single robust verdict.
  • Interactive demo — Gradio app supports both image and video input.

Architecture

Input (224×224 face crop)
  └─ EfficientNet-B4 backbone (ImageNet pretrained)
       ├─ Blocks 0–4  →  frozen (feature extraction)
       └─ Blocks 5–8  →  fine-tuned (LR = 1e-4)
           └─ Global Average Pooling
               └─ Dropout(0.4) → Linear(1792→256) → ReLU → Dropout(0.2) → Linear(256→1)
                   └─ Sigmoid → probability [0, 1]  (≥ 0.5 = Fake)
  • Loss: Focal Loss (α=0.25, γ=2.0) — handles the 5:1 fake/real imbalance
  • Optimizer: AdamW with differential learning rates (backbone 1e-4, head 5e-4)
  • Scheduler: CosineAnnealingLR over 20 epochs with early stopping (patience=5)
  • GPU: NVIDIA RTX A4000

Dataset

Celeb-DF v2 — 590 real celebrity videos + 5,639 high-quality deepfake videos.

  • 15 frames extracted per video (uniform temporal sampling)
  • MTCNN face detection → 224×224 crops, 20 px margin
  • Split by video ID (80/10/10) — prevents identity leakage between train and test
  • ~74,000 real face crops · ~477,000 fake face crops

Usage

Quick inference (image)

import torch
from torchvision import transforms
from PIL import Image
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download

# Download checkpoint
ckpt_path = hf_hub_download(repo_id="honi05/deepfake-detection", filename="best_model.pt")

# Load model
from src.model import DeepfakeClassifier
model = DeepfakeClassifier(freeze_blocks=5, dropout=0.4, backbone='b4')
state = torch.load(ckpt_path, map_location="cpu", weights_only=True)
model.load_state_dict(state["model_state_dict"])
model.eval()

# Preprocess
transform = transforms.Compose([
    transforms.Resize((224, 224)),
    transforms.ToTensor(),
    transforms.Normalize([0.485, 0.456, 0.406], [0.229, 0.224, 0.225]),
])

img = Image.open("face.jpg").convert("RGB")
x = transform(img).unsqueeze(0)

with torch.no_grad():
    logit = model(x)
    prob = torch.sigmoid(logit).item()

print(f"Fake probability: {prob:.3f}")
print("Verdict:", "FAKE" if prob >= 0.5 else "REAL")

Grad-CAM explainability

from src.gradcam import GradCAM

grad_cam = GradCAM(model)
heatmap, confidence = grad_cam.compute(img_tensor)   # (224,224) heatmap in [0,1]
overlay = grad_cam.overlay(img_pil, heatmap)         # PIL image with jet overlay

top_zones = grad_cam.get_top_zones(heatmap, top_k=2)
print("Most activated zones:", top_zones)

Forensic report

from src.forensic_text import generate_forensic_report

report = generate_forensic_report(confidence=0.91, zone1="eyes", zone2="jaw")
print(report)
# HIGH CONFIDENCE FAKE (91.0%) — Eyes region shows unnatural reflection/texture
# patterns inconsistent with genuine facial geometry. Jaw area exhibits visible
# blending seam characteristic of face-swap artefacts.

Gradio demo (image + video)

python demo/app.py

Explainability — Facial Zones

The model maps Grad-CAM activations to 5 facial zones (pixel rows in the 224×224 crop):

ZoneRowsCommon deepfake artefacts
Forehead0–60Hair boundary blending, skin tone mismatch
Eyes60–100Unnatural reflection, pupil shape, lash generation
Nose100–145Texture discontinuity, geometry distortion
Jaw145–185Blending seam at jaw-line, edge softening
Hairline185–224Hair generation artefacts, boundary warping

The top-2 activated zones are included in the forensic report.


Ablation Results

ConfigurationTest AUCvs Baseline
Baseline (this model)0.9933—
No data augmentation0.9701−2.32%
EfficientNet-B0 backbone0.9612−3.21%
BCE loss (no focal)0.9814−1.19%
Fully fine-tuned (no freezing)0.9878−0.55%

Key findings: data augmentation and the larger B4 backbone provide the biggest gains. Focal loss measurably improves handling of the class imbalance. Selective freezing slightly outperforms full fine-tuning (likely due to overfitting risk with the large backbone).


Limitations

  • Binary classification only (real vs. fake) — does not identify the generation method
  • No temporal modelling — each frame is classified independently
  • Trained on Celeb-DF v2 only — may not generalise equally to StyleGAN or diffusion-based fakes
  • High-compression video can suppress the artefacts the model relies on
  • False Positive Rate of ~15.9% on the test set

Files

FileDescription
best_model.ptTrained weights (model_state_dict + training metadata)
app.pyGradio demo (image + video tabs)
requirements.txtPython dependencies

Full source code: github.com/Honi05/DeepFakeDetector


Citation

If you use this model, please cite:

@misc{arora2026deepfake,
  title   = {Deepfake Detection with Explainable Forensic Analysis Using EfficientNet-B4 and Grad-CAM},
  author  = {Arora, Honi},
  year    = {2026},
  url     = {https://huggingface.co/honi05/deepfake-detection}
}

Acknowledgements

Quellen

1 Quelle
Hugging FacePrimärVersion a64cf6f9e166fb166db322b6729a6b5788ec80b2
huggingface.co/honi05/deepfake-detection/tree/a64cf6f9e166fb166db322b6729a6b5788ec80b2

Verifiziert 2. Nov.

Modellartefakte

1 Artefakt

best_model.pt

pt · 69,4 MB · SHA-256 c5ee7e80ee76…f700 · Hugging Face

Download file

Quellenauszüge

2 Auszüge

--- language: - en license: mit library_name: pytorch pipeline_tag: image-classification tags: - deepfake-detection - deepfake - media-forensics - video-forensics - face-detection - computer-vision - image-classification - video-classification - efficientnet - grad-cam - explainable-ai - xai - pytorch - gradio - celeb-df datasets: - celeb-df-v2 metrics: - accuracy - f1 - roc_auc model-index: - name: EfficientNet-B4 Deepfake Detector results: - task: type: image-classification name: Deepfake Detection (frame-level) dataset: name: Celeb-DF v2 type: celeb-df-v2 metrics: - type: roc_auc value: 0.9933 name: Frame-Level AUC-ROC - type: accuracy value: 0.9746 name: Frame Accuracy - type: f1 value: 0.9855 name: Frame F1 Score - task: type: video-classification name: Deepfake Detection (video-level) dataset: name: Celeb-DF v2 type: celeb-df-v2 metrics: - type: roc_auc value: 0.9990 name: Video-Level AUC-ROC --- # EfficientNet-B4 Deepfake Detector with Grad-CAM Explainability A high-accuracy deepfake face detector trained on **Celeb-DF v2**, combining an EfficientNet-B4 backbone with Grad-CAM spatial attribution and a deterministic forensic report generator. The model classifies face images as real or fake and highlights *which facial region* triggered the decision. **Bachelor project — Sapienza Università di Roma, AI & Applied Computer Science** --- ## Model Performance | Metric | Score | |---|---| | Frame-Level AUC-ROC | **0.9933** | | Video-Level AUC-ROC | **0.9990** | | Frame Accuracy | **97.46%** | | Frame F1 Score | **98.55%** | | False Negative Rate | **0.44%** (37 / 8,475 fakes missed) | > Video-level scores are computed by mean-aggregating frame probabilities per video ID, which suppresses single-frame noise and reflects real-world deployment. --- ## What Makes This Different - **Explainable predictions** — Grad-CAM heatmaps highlight the exact facial zone (forehead, eyes, nose, jaw, or hairline) that triggered the detection. - **Forensic text output** — A template engine converts confidence + activated zones into a structured human-readable forensic report (4 confidence tiers). - **Video-level reasoning** — Frame scores are aggregated per video for a single robust verdict. - **Interactive demo** — Gradio app supports both image and video input. --- ## Architecture ``` Input (224×224 face crop)...

Source context: 0 downloads · 0 likes · Pipeline image-classification · Library pytorch · Repo honi05/deepfake-detection